Sunday, May 2, 2010
Micro-seconds from death (I)
Tuesday, July 28, 2009
My responses to Prof. Bolaji Aluko on Lt. Col. Victor Banjo
Response to Prof. Bolaji Aluko on Victor Banjo (1)
Prof. Aluko, You wrote:
>Wale: While waiting for the 24-hours to read more excerpts, I am intrigued at
>the gospel-like nature that you have conferred on Auntie Bimpe's book on
>her brother, which can only be second-hand accounts.
I disagree with your assertion about “second hand account”. First, the woman, along with her husband (Prof. Ayo Ogunsheye), was a member of the Yoruba Leaders of Thought group assembled to chart a way forward for the Yoruba Nation in the aftermath of the July 1966 counter-coup by Northern military officers.
Secondly, it is not my view that you should agree with what I write. But kindly understand that God also endowed we younger ones with some wisdom to understand certain unspoken words. Persons junior to me work with the CIA and MI6 as analysts pouring over scores of documents to positively identify threats and proffer solutions to challenges without being on the field AT ALL! Ojukwu’s book is welcome anytime he wants to publish it. But whatever he writes will be placed side by side with other accounts of the war for each individual or group to make up their minds about the ‘truth’. And that is what I have done given the books and other accounts of the war I have digested so far.
But please read Prof. Ogunsheye’s account as my response to this first issue. Other answers will follow shortly:
“In July of 1966, the Northern army officers executed their own coup. They killed Maj. Gen. Ironsi, the Head of State, while he was a guest of the Western Region Military Governor,
“The army officers retaliated the killing of the civilian Prime Minister and the Northern Premier and quite a number of army officers of Northern origin by killing many Ibo army officers. This was followed in the North by the pogrom, a genocide massacre directed at Ibos in the North. Many Yorubas were also victims of this massacre. It took everybody by surprise. There was a mass exodus of Ibos to the East and a similar movement of Yorubas to the West.
“Gowon was installed as the new Head of State in
“With the arrival of the Yoruba refugees in the West, the Yoruba leadership was in a dilemma. Under Gowon’s regime, the family had enjoyed a respite from harassment and had experienced a feeling of being back into the mainstream of politics. My husband and I were, therefore, invited to the Yoruba Leaders of Thought meeting. This meeting was called to deliberate on the stand of the Yorubas. They decided at the meeting that if the East was allowed to secede, the West would not be part of a truncated
“In the confusion that followed the pogrom, Gowon, in a statement, had admitted that the basis for one
We gathered that Victor was among those he released. He was now a free man. He had offered to come over to the West and offered his services to the Gowon Government. Gowon is alleged to have replied that he could only come over as a prisoner. Instead of leaving the country, as we expected him to do, he had stayed on as friend and adviser to Ojukwu. It was alleged that he was helping him to train an Army for reasons he gave in the next episode as Commander of the National Liberation Army. The family with this development came again under the surveillance of the federal forces in power.”
Wale Adedayo
________________________________________________________________________________
(Banjo was detained from January 18, 1966 - May 30/first week in June
1967. [When he was released is questionable, but my gut feeling was that
it was within days of May 30. Banjo stated that he was detained for 14
months in his August 1967
at February/March 1967, unless of course he was talking about being
jailed in one place (Ikot-Ekpene? ) for 14 months. Obi Nwakanma says
that he was released by Ojukwu in April - but how could that be since
Ojukwu had no power to release a man jailed for TREASON to the NATION in
APril 1967 BEFORE he declared
release in April would put him in the East - and possibly in
May 5-7 when Awolowo's delegation met with Ojukwu. Was Banjo anywhere
around then? Is there any record of that? Or since Awolowo was jailed
in nearby Calabar until August 1966 - meaning that Banjo and Awo were
co-prisoners within travelling distance of each other for possibly 5 - 7
months, maybe they discussed and agreed on the
) –Prof. Bolaji Aluko.
Prof. Ogunsheye: “After the (Yoruba) Leaders of Thought meeting, a decision had been taken to contact him (Victor Banjo). We (herself & husband) were required to provide a code which will assure him that they (those sent on the mission) were not spies, but bona fide emissary of the West. We had suggested that they used a combination of numbers that was derived from the registration numbers of our two cars. It seemed brilliant at the time. We felt the West was going to get help. We had seemed exposed and helpless after the Leaders of Thought meeting.
“It was rumoured that soldiers of Western origin had been disarmed, and armed soldiers of Northern origin had not been resposted to the North as was agreed. Instead, they had been reinforced by soldiers of Chadian origin.
“The West was, therefore, in a state of siege by the Northern soldiers. It was rumoured that some Ibos who had stayed in the West had been molested in the market and were stoutly defended by the Yorubas. Some Ibos were in fact taking refuge with some Yoruba families. The university staff who were of Ibo origin had almost all left the
“Then came the news that a force led by
Prof. Bolaji Aluko: (- Re-structuring of Nigeria from 4 regions to 12 states occurred on May
27; secession by Biafra occurred May 30, war started July 6 as "police
action" from the Federal side, and invasion of the Midwest started
August 9, and movement to the West was to proceed without delay
thereafter. Was the invasion/liberation of the Midwest/West planned
BEFORE the secession/war, or does it take a month for plan it, and for
Banjo to also commence and conclude all the agreements with the top
political and military leaders of the
example, according to Obi Nwakanma, was the vote taken in which
OGBEMUDIA voted for the take-over, and only one un-named person voted
against it?)
I believe Ojukwu was hasty in the decision to implement the secessionist plan almost immediately. Strategically, he could have bought more time for the young nation by noise making and other kinds of propaganda as he continues negotiation/mediation with Gowon while training and arming the Biafran Army, away from Federal glare. Afterall, the East, as it were then was a no go area for ANY federal sysmpathiser. Banjo mentioned something similar in his defence at the kangaroo tribunal that sentenced the cream de la cream of the
The first person Banjo called on the phone after making his broadcast in
“This broadcast (by Banjo) was neither relayed by any other radio station in
“It was alleged that Awolowo did meet him, when he visited the East on a peace mission before the announcement of secession. Victor in his marathon defence before the Biafran Tribunal confirmed that there was a previous agreement with the Western leaders. ‘When Ojukwu decided to declare an independent Republic of Biafra, I pleaded with him to postpone it as both the people of West and Mid-West were not as yet at that stage sufficiently strong militarily to take the same stand, even though they would wish it. I pointed out to him that his declaration of
“There was no doubt that Victor borrowed troops from Ojukwu and received his help in the form of a Liberation Army. He had assisted Ojukwu with training of Biafran troops and fought brilliantly to protect the Northern Front as head of the 101st Division. In return, Ojukwu let him have the free hand to use the Brigade Victor led to liberate the Mid-West. His intention was to proceed to the West to liberate it. There were no previous written conditions attached on the political dispensation of the Mid-West except that it would be free and independent of both
“In fact, it was a Liberation Army as he emphasized in his broadcast. Njoku, in his book: A tradegy without heroes, confirmed that before the Mid-West invasion of August 9, 1967, there was no information with the Biafran Army Commander Headquarters about Biafran troops on operation to the Mid-West. The letter dated 22nd August received at the Army Headquarters in
“The speed of the 9th of August operation had taken everyone by surprise. Victor had studied military strategy and had employed an element of surprise in his two pronged invasion of the Mid-West taking on both
“I was worried after his broadcast. Will the West accept his offer of liberation by a troop made up of Biafran soldiers? Suddenly, the telephone rang. Victor’s voice came on loud and clear from nowhere! ‘Hi Sis! It’s me!’ I could not believe it. We have not heard from him since the Eastern Region declared secession on May 30, 1967. ‘Where are you speaking from?’ I said, with fear for his safety gripping me. ‘I am speaking from
“Fifteen minutes later, a member of the front benchers called. He had called earlier in the day to apprise me of the presence of Victor in
Wale Adedayo
________________________________________________________________________________
Prof. Bolaji Aluko: (Does Auntie Bimpe's book tell you/us anything about where Victor Banjo was between August 22 and September 22? Was he in Biafra,
commanding troops towards
or arguing endlessly with Ojukwu?)
I believe this has been answered in the second part where the woman revealed Banjo was detained by Ojukwu for his effrontery in making the categorical statements he did after the successful seizure of the Mid-West.
(If, in fact the Western leaders BETRAYED him, that means that he could
NOT convince Ojukwu of that, whereupon he was executed on September 25,
1967. Would that not be a miscarriage of justice, some kind of
scape-goatism? But more intriguing, who betrayed Ifeajuna, Agbamuche
and Alale - the same Midwestern/Western leaders?)
No sir! The four guys murdered by Ojukwu through the machinations of those envious of their brilliance and closeness to Ojukwu had almost the same thoughts. Banjo was betrayed on three fronts – Yoruba Leaders who accepted the Hausa-Fulani divide and conquer gift of including them in Gowon’s government; the ‘Federal’ Government and the Biafran Nation, which exhibited the worst form of ingratitude to a military genius whose warning they refused to heed leading to the avoidable slaughter and needless deaths of thousands either through bullets, bombs or hunger. The other three were betrayed by the same ‘Federal’ Government, because as in the case of Banjo, they wanted rapprochement with Nigeria and by the Igbo people, who refused to see the danger clearly ahead of them despite warnings by the brilliant trio who did more than all the Njokus of this world in the way and manner they pursued the Biafran agenda.
(For me, when I read Banjo's speech, Ojukwu's letter and the chronology
of events, there are just too many things that don't add up, and really,
it is hard for me to see how Prof. Bimpe Ogunseye's sisterly book can
shed light on these.)
The following is Prof. Ogunsheye’s analytical response to Ojukwu’s letter of after thought:
“This letter had been overtaken by events. The West had been rearmed and were now participating in the Federal Government as partners. Awolowo was now a Federal Minister in Gowon’s government. Victor, however, did not raise any issue with Ojukwu. He knew the situation had changed. He could now only march to the West as an invader at the head of a Brigade of foreign Biafran troops. He had announced on August 9 in
“He would support Victor in his attempt to liberate the West. He now had the backing of his Council to loan him Biafran forces on certain conditions:
a.) Biafran troops will remain in the West after the liberation for as long as he, Ojukwu, and
b.) During that period, all political measures, statements and decrees must be subject to Ojukwu’s approval or on his authority;
c.) Victor’s appointment as military governor of the Yorubaland will emanate from Ojukwu and be subject to his pleasure;
d.) Should
“How, after the volte-face in the Mid-West, anyone expects Victor to accept these conditions beats the imagination! Victor must have written his consent as required in the document. He thus won his freedom from arrest and detention to lead now the 54th Brigade to Yorubaland?
“Victor thought he needed time to work out another strategy to resolve the problem in keeping in view his ideas on the concept of one
“It has been suggested in the writings of some Biafran officers that Victor was unable to return to the West. Even Gowon admitted to his wife that they knew he had nothing to do with the January 15, 1966 coup. Nobody was looking for him for a revenge action. In the West, he was well thought of. Victor was a nationalist to the core. He sympathised with the Biafrans for the genocide directed at them, but his concept of one
“This gave credence to the real or imagined dialogue between Ojukwu and Victor that Kole Omotoso recorded in his book, Just before dawn, (pages 286/287). ‘Victor …”We must enlarge the base of the struggle beyond the suffering Ibos.” Ojukwu …”Victor, I don’t know if you know how much people have suffered …” Victor …”We must not forget the feelings of the minorities … They are of importance in the way this whole thing will turn out.” Ojukwu … “Don’t talk to me about minorities,” Ojukwu said, waving aside the issue. Victor Banjo could not believe that someone of Ojukwu’s intelligence could not recognise that the case of the Ibos must be a base to launch forward for the rest of the country.”
“The full import of this discussion must have dawned on Victor, if in fact, it did take place. On his release from detention to return to
“Victor always liked tidy situations according to records left in his trail. He stopped to make sure there was a friendly government behind him in the Mid-West, instead of dashing off to
Ends. For now. But I am prepared for queries.
Wale Adedayo
Tuesday, June 16, 2009
A short history of Ijebu Ife
A short history of Ijebu Ife
The following is an account of the history of Ijebu Ife as recorded by historians and which is in accord with the traditions handed down by the ancestors of the King of the town, Ajalorun:
Olofin Ogbolu, eldest son of King Oduduwa succeeded his father. He had only reigned for some few years in Ile Ife when, as a result of an annual consultation of Ifa Oracle, the High Priest delivered a message that unless the King, Olofin Ogbolu, relocate from the town with all his sub-chiefs to another part of the Yoruba country to establish themselves anew, Ile Ife and its surrounding towns would be destroyed by flood.
As was customary with our ancestors, Olofin had no choice than to abide with what Ifa decreed. And in company with his chiefs and people, he arrived in many places where Ifa, upon consultations, did not allow him to settle. Some of these include Emuren in Remo Division, Isiwu in Ikorodu Division, Erunwon and Ilefon near Ijebu Ode, Odogbolu, Okemori and Idotun near Isonyin, Odongbodu, Egbe, Okeyejo, Okelugbogu, Imomo, etc, in Ilugun Alaro area of Ijebu Division.
The Elemuren, the Elerunwon, the Alse Omo of Isiwu were permitted by the Ajalorun Olofin Ogbolu to wear beaded crown. “In 1894” the Elemuren entered into treaty of friendship and protection with the British government. There was none of the articles of that treaty in which Elemuren was referred to as “chief” but as King of Emuren.
The Elemuren is a traditional son of Oba Ajalorun of Ijebu Ife to whom he owes the origin of his crown (see page 47 Obaship and Chieftancy by E. Alademomi Kenyo). The Elerunwon of Erunwon near Ijebu Ode has been wearing beaded crown in his settlement since about 1445 A.D. before the Ajalorun finally arrived in Idofe, Oke Ife, about 1450 A.D. i.e 20 years before Obanta arrived in Ijebu in 1470 A.D.
The Intelligence Report of May 1943 by T. B. Bowell-Jones, District Officer (Special Duty) para. 35B Ijebu Ode Villages, admit that the Elerunwon left Ile Ife with the Ajalorun of Ijebu Ife, first settling at Imewuro in the Ilugun Area, then at Idorunwon and Iwaye in the same area, thence to Idotun near Isonyin and finally to Erunwon, where the Ifa oracle was consulted with favourable results; the Ajalorun was the elder brother and that Obanta had not yet arrived in Ijebu Ode.
Excerpts from: History of Ijebu Ife.
Monday, November 10, 2008
No genuine democracy without credible journalism
- Wale Adedayo, a journalist, is the Chief Press Secretary to the Ogun State Governor.
The Media in a Young Democracy*
I often get criticised by colleagues for describing Nigeria as a young democracy. And interestingly enough, some senior journalists often compare the situation in the country to that of the developed democracies when commenting about the shortcomings of the Nigerian system.
But a young democracy is one where the institutions that guarantee due process in governance are still weak. Compared with the U.S or U.K, the Nigerian judiciary, mass media, law enforcement agencies and the individuals who run these agencies are just coming to terms with how things should be done in a democratic polity. Even for those who know, a fear of being victimised through dismissal or demotion is constant on their minds.
While it is true that there are other institutions that are NATURALLY expected to act as pillars for strengthening democracy in any country, the most important of all is the mass media. Without information nothing can work. Thus, any society which claims to be democratic must concomitantly have vibrant mass media organisations. Journalists in such a society must also have very high standards of training from the universities or polytechnics to the effect that the quality of their reports and ethical matters relating to the journalism profession are given priorities.
Cognisant of the fact that without credible journalists, there cannot be democracy, the developed democracies have over the years put in place structures that continually monitor the training of media practitioners in order to get the highest standard possible from this set of professionals, who can make or mar democratic practice.
One is aware of the concern of a few credible media owners in Nigeria about the quality of Mass Communication or journalism graduates. This has to do with the ability of such graduates to write good English and ask sensible questions during interviews. But till date, it is doubtful if there has been any conscious effort to link Nigeria ’s democratic development with an urgent need to insist on Political Communication as a core course for all Mass Communication courses in our higher institutions.
Naturally, there should be a law guaranteeing Freedom of Information and protection of the rights of those who squeal on the illegal activities of elected or appointed officials of government. Democracy presupposes that the citizens have a right to choose between competing individuals, political parties and ideas during regular elections. But it is also an established fact that only those who are well informed can make credible choices. Currently in Nigeria , information about government activities can only be given to interested members of the public ONLY if the officials concerned want to. This should not happen in a democracy.
Because of the enormous power of the media, abuses also abound. Today in Nigeria a number of media houses are owned by persons who have a lot of things to hide. What obtains in such places is so sad that they continue to muddle the waters of Nigerian politics. But the public is not so deceived anymore. Statistics show that the highest selling newspaper in Nigeria today does a maximum of 50,000 copies per day. That is even on a very good day.
Developed democracies have institutions that ensure minimal abuses by political actors. Employing rumour mongering as it is often done here to bring down a government can hardly work in the United Kingdom or United States where the citizens can easily access information. It is also very unlikely to bribe a journalist or media organisation to continually dish out fabricated stories to run down political opponents or others in a developed democracy. The law enforcement agencies, the judiciary and the professional organisations often ensure that such do not happen in the U.K. and U.S. , for instance.
The challenge we have is to encourage the enactment of laws that will encourage the strengthening of our democratic institutions. Policemen and other law enforcement agents who perform their duties creditably should be rewarded, not victimised. Bad eggs should be shown the way out. Judges should not be denied due entitlements because they give negative judgments to those holding political offices.
An FOI law that will be used to check abuses by government officials is also good to ask questions from journalists who cannot explain the source of their sudden wealth. With an FOI law in place, rumour mongering, which is another prevalent issue in a young democracy will be a thing of the past. Journalists will no longer be made to dish out rumours as ‘facts’ to the people. Securing convictions against criminal elements by our law enforcement agencies will also become easier.
* Mr. Adedayo, Chief Press Secretary to the Ogun State Governor, delivered this paper to students of Mass Communication Department, Olabisi Onabanjo University , Ago Iwoye, Ogun State on Thursday, 7 February 2008.